Wilson v. United States

1914-02-24
Share:

Headline: Affirms convictions under the White‑Slave Act, rules the law covers arranging interstate transport by private agents, and upholds trial rulings that supported prosecution for bringing women for prostitution.

Holding: The Court affirms the convictions, holding that the federal statute reaches people who pay or direct private agents to transport women across state lines for prostitution, and finds no reversible trial errors in the record.

Real World Impact:
  • Allows prosecution when private agents are paid to transport women across state lines.
  • Permits questioning witnesses about drug use to challenge testimony reliability.
  • Accepts business records and payments to police as evidence of house character.
Topics: human trafficking, prostitution, interstate travel, witness credibility

Summary

Background

This case involves people who kept a house of prostitution in Chicago, two girls taken from Milwaukee, and a man named Corder who was paid to bring the girls to Chicago. The defendants were indicted under the federal White‑Slave Act for causing and procuring the women’s interstate transportation for the purpose of prostitution. The trial produced a general guilty verdict and the case reached the Court on questions other than the statute’s constitutionality, which had already been decided against the defendants.

Reasoning

The main question was whether the statute requires transportation by a common carrier or also covers other means. The Court held the law is not limited to common carriers and reaches people who employ or pay private agents to move women across state lines for prostitution. The Court also reviewed trial rulings: it allowed cross‑examination about a witness’s morphine use as relevant to credibility, permitted questions about domestic quarrels and business records to corroborate an accomplice, found jury instructions on innocence and reasonable doubt adequate, and rejected the claim that abandoning the plan after arrival avoided liability.

Real world impact

The decision makes it clear that federal prosecutors may convict people who hire others to transport women between states for prostitution, not only those who use common carriers. It confirms that courts can probe witnesses’ drug use and consider business records to test testimony and show the character of a place. The judgments convicting the defendants were affirmed and the trial record contained no reversible error.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases