Johannessen v. United States

1912-05-27
Share:

Headline: Upheld law letting the Government cancel citizenship certificates obtained by fraud, affirming a court’s cancellation of a Norwegian immigrant’s naturalization and allowing review of old certificates.

Holding: The Court affirmed the cancellation of a citizenship certificate obtained by fraud, holding that Congress may authorize courts to set aside pre-existing naturalizations procured through perjured testimony and that the statute is constitutional.

Real World Impact:
  • Allows the Government to sue to cancel fraudulently obtained citizenship certificates.
  • Applies to older certificates issued before the 1906 law.
  • Requires notice and a hearing before a certificate can be canceled.
Topics: citizenship revocation, naturalization fraud, immigration law, court review

Summary

Background

Johannessen, a native of Norway, applied for and received a certificate of citizenship from a Washington state court in 1892 after arriving in the United States in December 1888. The certificate rested on two witnesses’ perjured testimony that he had lived in the United States five years. In 1908 Johannessen admitted by affidavit that he had not met the residency requirement. The United States district attorney then sued under section 15 of the 1906 naturalization act to cancel the certificate; the district court overruled a demurrer, entered a decree canceling the certificate, and Johannessen appealed.

Reasoning

The Court addressed whether Congress may authorize courts to set aside naturalization certificates obtained by fraud, including those issued before the 1906 act. It explained that naturalization applications are commonly ex parte, not adversary, so certificates issued on an applicant’s unopposed proof are not conclusively binding against the public. The Court likened certificates to other public grants that may be revoked for fraud or mistake, held that section 15 validly provides for judicial review and cancellation with fair notice to the holder, and rejected the claim that the statute is an unconstitutional ex post facto law.

Real world impact

The decision allows the Government to bring court actions to cancel citizenship certificates fraudulently obtained, including older certificates issued before the 1906 law, and requires notice and a hearing before cancellation. Individuals whose naturalizations rest on perjury may lose citizenship privileges after judicial review.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases