Lawder v. Stone
Headline: Court rules that fruit made utterly worthless during the voyage does not count as imported goods for duties, preventing customs from charging tax and easing burdens on importers of decayed cargo.
Holding: The Court held that pineapples rendered utterly worthless during the voyage are not "imported" goods under section 23 of the customs statute, so customs may not assess duties on those decayed items and the importer prevails.
- Prevents customs from charging duties on cargo rendered worthless during transit.
- Allows importers to avoid duty payments for decayed, unusable shipments.
- Affirms officials and courts may treat totally ruined items as non-imports for duty purposes.
Summary
Background
The dispute involved an importer and the Baltimore customs collector over shipments of pineapples that became rotten and utterly worthless on the voyage. The collector treated the loss as damage within section 23 of the customs administrative act of June 10, 1890, and sought duties; the key question was whether completely decayed fruit arriving at port still counted as "goods, wares and merchandise imported into the United States."
Reasoning
The Court relied on earlier decisions and Treasury rulings holding that duties are meant to be collected only on articles that actually arrive and possess some value. It explained that section 23 contemplates damaged items that retain value and may be abandoned and sold, not cargo that has become entirely valueless in transit. The opinion surveyed prior cases and Treasury decisions treating totally worthless cargo as not being importations subject to duty, found no clear Congressional intent in 1890 to change that practice, and concluded the rotten pineapples were not "imported" goods for duty purposes. The Court reversed the Court of Appeals, affirmed the lower Circuit Court, and remanded with directions to carry the judgment into effect.
Real world impact
As a result, customs officials may not assess duties on items that were rendered absolutely worthless by decay or casualty before they came into use or possession in the United States. Importers of cargo that becomes totally ruined on the voyage can avoid paying duties on that portion, consistent with the historical practice and Treasury rulings quoted by the Court.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?