Republican Nat'l Comm. v. Democratic Nat'l Comm.

2020-04-06
Share:

Headline: Court blocks counting of absentee ballots mailed and postmarked after election day, requiring April 7 postmark or hand delivery and stopping late-mailed votes despite an extended April 13 receipt deadline.

Holding: The Court stayed the lower court’s order and ruled that absentee ballots must be postmarked by April 7 or hand-delivered by April 7 to be counted, despite an extended April 13 receipt deadline, pending appeal.

Real World Impact:
  • Requires absentee ballots to be postmarked by April 7 or hand-delivered by April 7 to count.
  • May leave voters who receive ballots after April 7 unable to vote by mail.
  • Creates uncertainty for election officials and delays in counting until appeals conclude.
Topics: absentee ballots, election rules, voter access, COVID-19 and voting

Summary

Background

A group of Wisconsin voters, community organizations, and the state and national Democratic parties sued members of the Wisconsin Elections Commission seeking changes to absentee voting because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The District Court extended the deadline to request ballots and extended the deadline for municipal clerks to receive completed absentee ballots from April 7 to April 13, and it ordered that ballots postmarked after April 7 could still be counted if received by April 13. The District Court also enjoined release of election results before April 13.

Reasoning

The narrow question before the Court was whether absentee ballots could be mailed and postmarked after election day and still be counted. The Court granted a stay of the District Court’s order, explaining that plaintiffs had not asked for counting ballots postmarked after election day, and stressing that lower courts should not change election rules on the eve of an election. The Court said that, subject to state-law changes, to be counted a mailed absentee ballot must be postmarked by April 7 and received by April 13 at 4:00 p.m., or be hand-delivered by April 7 at 8:00 p.m. The stay is in place while the Seventh Circuit appeal and any petition for certiorari proceed.

Real world impact

The decision limits the ability of voters who receive absentee ballots after April 7 to vote by mail, even though clerks may accept ballots until April 13. It creates immediate effects for Wisconsin voters, election officials, and anyone relying on the District Court’s earlier schedule, and it is temporary while appeals continue.

Dissents or concurrances

Justice Ginsburg, joined by three colleagues, dissented, arguing the Court’s intervention will likely disenfranchise many voters because the pandemic caused a surge in absentee requests and a backlog of ballots not yet mailed; she would have left the District Court’s relief in place.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases