Evco v. Jones

1972-12-04
Share:

Headline: Limits state taxing power by rejecting New Mexico’s tax on proceeds from out-of-state sales of instructional materials, ruling such taxes burden interstate commerce and cannot be applied to goods sold outside the State.

Holding:

Real World Impact:
  • Stops states from taxing gross receipts on goods sold to out-of-state buyers.
  • Protects in-state creators supplying tangible originals for out-of-state publishers from that tax.
  • Allows states to tax services performed in-state when the tax targets the service itself.
Topics: state taxation, interstate commerce, sales of goods, gross receipts tax

Summary

Background

Evco is a New Mexico company that hires writers and artists to create reproducible originals of books, films, and audio tapes. Evco develops instructional programs in New Mexico, then delivers the camera-ready originals to customers in other States, where those customers publish the final textbooks and manuals. New Mexico’s tax commissioner assessed the State’s Emergency School Tax and a Gross Receipts Tax on the total proceeds Evco received from these contracts for 1966–1968, and Evco challenged the taxes as an unconstitutional burden on sales across state lines.

Reasoning

The Court reviewed whether New Mexico taxed the value of services performed in the State or instead taxed receipts from sales of tangible goods sold out-of-state. The decision explained that while a State may tax services performed inside the State, it may not tax gross receipts from sales of tangible personal property made to buyers in other States. The Court accepted the lower court’s factual finding that Evco’s reproducible originals were the essential thing sold and therefore that New Mexico’s tax fell on proceeds from out-of-state sales of tangible goods, not merely on in-state services.

Real world impact

Because the Court concluded the tax targeted proceeds from goods sold to out-of-state purchasers, it reversed the lower court and barred New Mexico from collecting those taxes on Evco’s out-of-state sales. The ruling protects businesses that produce tangible originals for out-of-state publishers from that kind of state tax, while leaving intact the idea that states can tax services performed in-state when the tax actually measures the service itself.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases