United States v. Alabama
Headline: Voting-rights enforcement allowed against a State: Court applies 1960 Civil Rights Act amendment to let the federal government sue a State over racial voting discrimination and sends the case back for further proceedings.
Holding:
- Allows the federal government to sue states over racially discriminatory voting practices.
- Sends this Alabama voting case back to district court for further proceedings.
Summary
Background
The United States sued the county board of registrars in Macon County, Alabama, and two local election officials, alleging a pattern of racially discriminatory practices meant to deny Black citizens the right to vote under the Fifteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1957. The Government originally proceeded under the 1957 law and later amended its complaint to add the State of Alabama. The District Court dismissed the case against all defendants, ruling the officials were no longer suable in office, the board was not a legal entity that could be sued, and the 1957 law did not authorize a suit against the State. The Court of Appeals affirmed that judgment.
Reasoning
While the case was pending here, Congress enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1960, which in §601(b) amended the enforcement statute to say the State can be joined as a defendant in suits alleging voting-rights deprivations. The Court therefore considered the case under the new law now controlling. It held that the 1960 amendment gives the District Court the authority to hear this suit against the State of Alabama. The Court did not decide the underlying merits of the voting-rights claims or any defenses the State might raise.
Real world impact
Because of this decision, the lower courts’ judgments are vacated and the case is sent back to the District Court with instructions to reinstate the action against the State and proceed consistent with the opinion. This ruling lets the federal government pursue claims against a State under the amended law, but it is not a final decision on whether the alleged discrimination actually occurred.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?