Cammer v. United States
Court limits judges' power to punish lawyers summarily, holding attorneys are not court 'officers' for quick contempt trials, reversing a conviction and reducing immediate judge-only penalties for lawyers.
Holding
The Court held that a lawyer is not the kind of court 'officer' who can be summarily tried for contempt under the federal contempt statute, and reversed the conviction and fine.
Real-world impact
- Prevents summary judge-only contempt punishments for lawyers under §401(2).
- Reverses conviction and $100 fine against the lawyer.
- Leaves criminal charges for jury influence to be pursued by indictment.
Topics
Summary
Background
A lawyer defended a man indicted for filing a false non-Communist affidavit and worried that many grand jurors were federal employees who might be biased. He mailed letters and questionnaires to the government-employee jurors asking about possible bias tied to the Government’s loyalty program. A district judge found the lawyer guilty of contempt under a federal statute and fined him $100; the Court of Appeals affirmed, and the case reached the high court.
Reasoning
The core question was whether a lawyer counts as one of the court’s
Opinions in this case
- 1.Opinion 105359
- 2.Opinion 9421239
- 3.Opinion 9421240
Questions, answered
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents). Try:
- “What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?”
- “How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?”
- “What are the practical implications of this ruling?”