Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.
Headline: Court limits FCC power by blocking agency rules that would outlaw radio and television 'give-away' shows when mere listening does not count as the required consideration under federal anti-lottery law.
Holding:
- Prevents the FCC from banning give-away shows where listening alone is required.
- Allows radio and TV networks to continue home-contest programs without criminal liability.
- Signals that only Congress or prosecutions can expand the statute’s reach.
Summary
Background
These cases were brought by national radio and television companies that operate licensed broadcast stations. The broadcasters challenged Federal Communications Commission rules aimed at stopping so-called "give-away" programs that award prizes to home listeners selected in whole or in part by chance. Examples in the record include "Stop the Music," "What's My Name," and "Sing It Again." The District Court sustained the FCC's authority generally and agreed one rule subdivision fit the criminal statute, but it struck down other rule parts that treated mere listening or hearing program clues as making a program an illegal lottery.
Reasoning
The Court framed the issue around the three traditional elements of a lottery: prize, chance, and consideration (a payment or thing of value). All parties agreed the programs involved prizes given by chance; they disagreed over whether a home listener's mere listening or following broadcast clues counts as the required consideration. The Court found no precedent holding passive listening satisfies consideration, noted that the Post Office Solicitor and the Attorney General had treated similar programs as not falling under lottery laws, and emphasized that criminal statutes must be strictly construed. The Court concluded the FCC had gone beyond what the statute allows and therefore could not, by regulation, make these programs criminal.
Real world impact
The ruling leaves broadcasters able to run home-contest give-away programs that do not require purchase or attendance, and it prevents the FCC from using this criminal statute to outlaw listening-only contests. If the law is to be changed, Congress or prosecutors — not the FCC by rule — must act.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?