Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Headline: Court affirms federal agency power to regulate and cut wholesale natural-gas field sales, upholding rate reductions and allowing federal oversight of producers whose sales supply markets in other states.
Holding: The Court held that the Federal Power Commission may regulate these in-field sales as interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act and affirmed the Commission’s order requiring substantial rate reductions.
- Allows federal agency to enforce rate cuts on in-field wholesale gas sales.
- Producers selling gas destined for other states face federal rate regulation.
- Maintains federal oversight when in-field sales affect downstream interstate prices.
Summary
Background
A gas producer operating 110 wells in the Monroe field sold gas in the field to three pipeline companies that transported the gas to markets in other States. The Federal Power Commission found those in-field sales were in interstate commerce, that one buyer was affiliated with the seller, and ordered rate reductions totaling $596,320 per year based on 1941 volumes. The producer challenged the Commission’s jurisdiction, arguing the sales were not “in interstate commerce” or were part of the exempted production or gathering process.
Reasoning
The Court focused on whether these sales were part of interstate commerce or instead fell within the Act’s production-and-gathering exception. The Court held the gas flowed without interruption and was committed to out-of-state markets from production, so the transactions were in interstate commerce. It emphasized that Congress intended the Natural Gas Act to address wholesale interstate rates and that the production-and-gathering exception is narrow and must be clearly shown. Because Louisiana had conservation laws and no evidence showed federal regulation conflicted with state control, the Court found no inconsistency preventing federal regulation.
Real world impact
The decision confirms that federal regulators may oversee and reduce wholesale field sales when gas is destined for other states and when such regulation does not clearly interfere with state control over production and gathering. Producers who sell gas that is committed to interstate shipment — especially where buyers are affiliated — can be subject to federal rate review and adjustment.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?