National Metropolitan Bank v. United States
Headline: Government recovers money from a bank that guaranteed prior endorsements on Treasury checks, even though government officials had negligently failed to detect an internal clerk’s repeated forgeries.
Holding: The Court holds that a bank that presented Treasury checks with an express guarantee of prior endorsements must repay the government when the payee signatures were forged, even though government officials were negligent in detecting the fraud.
- Makes banks liable when they guarantee prior endorsements on Treasury checks.
- Allows the government to recover payments despite administrative negligence.
- Affirms Treasury rules requiring endorsement guarantees as protection.
Summary
Background
A civilian clerk in a government pay office forged pay and mileage vouchers and caused 144 Treasury checks to be issued over 28 months. The forged checks were endorsed, cashed at a local bank, and then presented to a second bank that stamped a specific guarantee of prior endorsements and collected payment from the Treasury. The government discovered the fraud, asked for repayment, and sued the collecting bank for breach of warranty and money paid under a mistake of fact. The bank argued the endorsement stamp did not guarantee the payee’s signature and blamed government officers’ failure to detect the clerk’s fraud.
Reasoning
The Court addressed whether a bank’s express guarantee of prior endorsements makes the bank responsible when the payee signatures are forged, even if the government’s own officers were negligent in detecting the fraud earlier. Relying on earlier federal rules about government checks, the Court explained that presenting a check with an express guaranty creates a warranty that the payee’s signature is genuine. The Court distinguished earlier cases that dealt with forged drawer signatures and pointed to Treasury rules that require guarantee of prior endorsements for payment. The Court therefore concluded the collecting bank’s guarantee made it liable despite the government’s administrative negligence.
Real world impact
Banks that stamp or promise guarantees on government checks can be required to repay the Treasury when payee endorsements are forged. Government negligence in supervising its own disbursing officers does not automatically bar recovery. The Court left open the possibility that different facts might prevent recovery in other cases, but upheld the government’s right to restitution here.
Dissents or concurrances
One Justice agreed in the result, and one Justice did not participate in the decision.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?