Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Headline: Court revives FTC enforcement against Goodyear, ruling the appeal is not moot and allowing full review of whether discounted prices to Sears violated the Clayton Act.
Holding: The Court reversed the appeals court and remanded, holding that stopping the pricing practice and a later law change did not make the FTC enforcement case moot, so the price-discrimination claims must be decided on the merits.
- Keeps FTC orders issued before the amendment enforceable and reviewable.
- Prevents companies from mooting cases by merely stopping the challenged conduct.
- Returns the dispute for a full merits decision on price discrimination.
Summary
Background
In 1933 the Federal Trade Commission accused Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company of selling tires and related products to Sears, Roebuck & Company at discriminatory prices. After a hearing, the Commission concluded Goodyear’s price differences were unlawful and in March 1936 ordered Goodyear to stop those pricing practices. While Goodyear’s appeal was pending, Congress amended the Clayton Act in June 1936. Goodyear then changed its contracts with Sears, disposed of stock, and the two stopped doing business under the old terms, leading the Circuit Court of Appeals to say the case was moot and to set aside the Commission’s order.
Reasoning
The Court asked whether the parties’ change in conduct and the later law change removed a live controversy. The Court held they did not. The amendatory law itself preserved litigation and orders that were pending or in effect when the amendment took effect. The Commission’s cease-and-desist order was a continuing order that remained enforceable, and Goodyear retained the right to challenge that order’s validity in court. Because the dispute over whether the original pricing violated the Act remained unresolved, the Supreme Court reversed the appeals court and sent the case back for a decision on the merits.
Real world impact
The decision means enforcement orders issued by the Commission before the amendment stay alive for review and enforcement. Companies cannot necessarily avoid judicial review simply by stopping a challenged practice or pointing to a later law change. The appeals court must now decide whether Goodyear’s pricing to Sears actually violated the Clayton Act.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?