Southeastern Express Co. v. Pastime Amusement Co.

1936-11-09
Share:

Headline: Court enforces carrier's published tariff to limit damages for a delayed interstate film shipment, restricting recovery for business interruption and reversing the state court’s higher verdict.

Holding:

Real World Impact:
  • Prevents shippers from recovering business-interruption losses beyond tariff liability caps.
  • Enforces carriers' published tariffs when shipping interstate goods.
  • Requires courts to apply federal shipping law over conflicting state rulings in interstate disputes.
Topics: interstate shipping, carrier liability limits, damages for delayed delivery, tariff enforcement

Summary

Background

A person or business sued a carrier after a moving picture film shipment arrived late and could not be shown as advertised. A jury awarded $1,500, and the South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed that award. The shipment moved interstate from Jacksonville, Florida, to Charleston, South Carolina. The carrier’s filed tariff said liability was capped at $50 for shipments of 100 pounds or less (or 50 cents per pound for heavier shipments) unless a greater value was declared; the declared value in this case was $50 and the shipping rate was based on that value. The trial court and the state high court held the tariff limit did not apply because the suit sought damages for interruption of business caused by the delay.

Reasoning

The main question was whether federal shipping law (the Carmack Amendment) controls liability for interstate shipments and whether a carrier’s tariff can limit recovery for delay. The Court said the federal statute governs and is broad enough to cover all damages resulting from a carrier’s failure to perform, including delay-related losses. The opinion explains that carriers must base rates on declared value so compensation matches the risk accepted, and that tariffs must be applied uniformly rather than allowing special deals that favor particular shippers. Applying that reasoning, the Court held the tariff’s liability cap governed and barred recovery beyond the tariff limit.

Real world impact

As a result, businesses and entertainers who suffer lost revenue from late interstate deliveries may be unable to recover more than the carrier’s posted tariff limit when the shipper declared a limited value. State court rulings that ignore the federal tariff are overridden. The Supreme Court reversed the state judgment and sent the case back for further proceedings consistent with this ruling.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases