Millsaps College v. City of Jackson

1927-11-21
Share:

Headline: College endowment land used for rental income is taxable; Court upheld state ruling that donated off-campus lots aren’t exempt, allowing the city to assess and collect taxes on those properties.

Holding:

Real World Impact:
  • Allows cities to tax off-campus donated property producing income.
  • Limits nonprofit college tax exemptions to campus land and buildings.
  • Prevents labeling income property as endowment to avoid local taxes.
Topics: property taxes, nonprofit colleges, state tax law, endowment income

Summary

Background

Millsaps College is a nonprofit educational institution incorporated by a Mississippi law approved February 21, 1890. That law allowed the college to accept donations and to hold up to 100 acres as a campus and to exempt certain property and the endowment fund from state, county, and municipal taxation. Two improved lots on Capitol Street in Jackson were donated “in aid of the endowment,” are not part of the campus, and produce rental income used to pay the college’s operating expenses. The City assessed those lots and buildings, and the college sued to vacate the assessment, arguing the 1890 statute exempted the property and that taxing it would impair the contract embodied in the incorporation law.

Reasoning

The Mississippi Supreme Court interpreted the 1890 law as creating two limited exemptions: (1) campus land and buildings up to 100 acres, and (2) the endowment fund in a restricted sense. Because the donated Capitol Street lots were not campus property, the state court held they were not exempt. The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed the case because the college raised a federal contract-clause claim, gave respectful weight to the state court’s statutory interpretation, applied the rule that tax exemptions should be construed narrowly, and concluded the state court’s reading was correct. The U.S. Supreme Court therefore affirmed the judgment allowing taxation.

Real world impact

The decision lets the city tax off-campus donated property held to produce income for the college. It narrows nonprofit tax exemptions to campus land and buildings as described in the 1890 act, limiting attempts to shield income-producing property simply by calling it part of the endowment.

Ask about this case

Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).

What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?

How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?

What are the practical implications of this ruling?

Related Cases