Ottinger v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
Headline: New York’s 1923 gas-price law is blocked as confiscatory; Court upholds lower courts’ finding and prevents enforcement of the one-dollar-per-thousand-feet rule for 650 BTU gas, limiting state pricing power.
Holding:
- Blocks enforcement of New York’s one-dollar-per-thousand-feet price limit for 650 BTU gas.
- Affirms that the law would give gas companies less than a 5% return on utility property.
- Costs of the appeal are taxed against the Attorney General (the appellant).
Summary
Background
Separate lawsuits were brought by gas companies against New York’s Public Service Commission and the State Attorney General after the Legislature passed a 1923 law saying gas of 650 British thermal units must be sold at not more than one dollar per thousand feet. Before the law, the Brooklyn Union Gas Company charged one dollar fifteen cents and the Kings County Lighting Company charged one dollar thirty cents per thousand feet for lower-quality gas. Masters took evidence and reported on the financial effects, and the District Court issued injunctions blocking enforcement of the statute.
Reasoning
The Court focused on whether the statutory price would leave the companies a reasonable return on the value of their property used to serve the public. The masters reported the law would yield less than five per cent upon the fair value of the complainants’ property devoted to public use. The District Court concluded the statute was confiscatory in effect and also unreasonable because of the six hundred and fifty BTU standard. The Attorney General filed broad appeals, but the Court found no reason shown to reverse the District Court’s confiscation finding under the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore limited its review to that issue.
Real world impact
The Supreme Court modified the lower decrees by removing parts that invalidated the statute for reasons other than conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment because confiscatory in effect, and then affirmed the decrees as modified. As a practical result, the one-dollar-per-thousand-feet price limit for 650 BTU gas cannot be enforced as written because it was found confiscatory. The Public Service Commission did not seek an appeal, and appeal costs were taxed against the appellant.
Dissents or concurrances
Justice Brandeis concurred in the result; no other opinions are described in this opinion.
Ask about this case
Ask questions about the entire case, including all opinions (majority, concurrences, dissents).
What was the Court's main decision and reasoning?
How did the dissenting opinions differ from the majority?
What are the practical implications of this ruling?